Social Vulnerability in Flood Disaster Preparedness: A Narrative Review
Keywords:
social vulnerability, flood disaster preparedness, disaster risk reduction, vulnerability assessment, disaster resilienceAbstract
Flood disasters remain among the most common and destructive hazards worldwide, with climate change and rapid urbanization intensifying both hazard severity and susceptibility. This narrative review synthesizes factual and conceptual advancements concerning societal vulnerability in the context of flood catastrophe preparedness. The review integrates peer-reviewed studies and relevant technical and institutional literature, consolidating dominant definitions of vulnerability as a function of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, while considering recent developments that situate vulnerability within integrated Social–Ecological–Technological Systems (SETS). This analysis examines key assessment frameworks and tools, including Social Vulnerability Indices (SVIs), the MOVE framework, and the Flood Resilience Measurement for Communities (FRMC), highlighting the use of indicator-based methodologies to pinpoint vulnerability hotspots and inform decision-making. Evidence demonstrates that socioeconomic disadvantage, demographic characteristics, social capital, and institutional capacity consistently affect disparities in flood damage and recovery trajectories, often through intersectional and location-specific mechanisms. The review contends that equitable disaster risk reduction requires the integration of vulnerability metrics into planning and investment, the improvement of methodological transparency and local relevance of indicators, and the strengthening of social protection, inclusive risk communication, and accountable governance to transform assessments into concrete, actionable interventions.
Downloads
References
Ariyaningsih, R., & Shaw, R. (2022). Integration of the Social–Ecological–Technological Systems (SETS) framework and flood resilience cycle for smart flood risk management. Smart Cities, 5(4).
Birkmann, J., et al. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk, and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards.
Biswas, S., & Nautiyal, S. (2023). A review of socio-economic vulnerability: The emergence of its theoretical concepts, models and methodologies. Natural Hazards Research, 3(3), 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2023.05.005
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. (2025). 2024 disasters in numbers.
Chang, H., et al. (2025). A social-ecological-technological vulnerability approach for assessing urban hydrological risks. Journal of Environmental Management.
Chang, H., Thieken, A. H., et al. (2021). Assessment of urban flood vulnerability using the Social–Ecological–Technological Systems (SETS) framework in six US cities. Sustainable Cities and Society.
Curtis, A.G, Allres, S.B,. Murphy, R.C, Roberts, B.A. (2024) Exploring the role of social capital in community flood resiliency in Binghamton, NY. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212420924000840
Cutter, S. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.
Flanagan, B. E., et al. (2011). A social vulnerability index for disaster management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1).
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. (n.d.). Flood resilience measurement for communities (FRMC). https://iiasa.ac.at/models-tools-data/frmc
Keating, A., Campbell, K., Szoenyi, M., McQuistan, C., Nash, D., & Burer, M. (2017). Development and testing of a community flood resilience measurement tool. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17, 77–101.
Nielsen, A.B, Bonati, S, Andersen, N.B. (2023).Discover the dynamics: An intersectional analysis of overt and hidden vulnerabilities to flood risk in urban Denmark. (2023). Land Use Policy. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204623001184
Pathirana, A., Denekew, H. B., Veerbeek, W., Zevenbergen, C., & Banda, A. T. (2013). Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flooding in Can Tho city, Vietnam. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(1), 379–394.
Prall, M. C., et al. (2024). A comprehensive approach for assessing social flood vulnerability and social flood risk: The case of Denmark. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 111, 104686.
Reimann, L., et al. (2024). An empirical social vulnerability map for flood risk assessment at global scale (GlobE-SoVI). Earth’s Future, 12(1).
Rufat, S., et al. (2015). Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, 470–486.
Sadri, A. M., Ukkusuri, S. V., Lee, S., Clawson, R., Aldrich, D., Nelson, M. S., & Seipel, J. (2023). Exploring the role of social capital in flood risk reduction: Insights from a systematic review. Ocean & Coastal Management, 240, 106636. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195925523003566
Taganibuos, et al. (2025). Identifying gaps in research on social vulnerability to floods: A systematic review. Environmental Research Letters.
Umweltbundesamt. (n.d.). MOVE – Methods for the Improvement of Vulnerability Assessment in Europe. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/topics/climate-energy/climate-change-adaptation/adaptation-tools/project-catalog/move-methods-for-the-improvement-of-vulnerability
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2025). GAR 2025 hazard explorations: Floods.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2025). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2025: Resilience pays.
Kuran, C.H.A.K., Morsut, C., Kruke, B.I., Krüger, K., Segnestam, L., Orru, K., Tor Nævestad, T.O., Airola, M., Keränen, J., Gabel, F., Hansson, S., Torpan, S., (2020). Vulnerability and vulnerable groups from an intersectionality perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101826. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420920313285
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Xiong, A., Li, Y. (2024). The role of social capital in building community disaster resilience – empirical evidences from rural China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212420924003856
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish in the Journal of Clinical Nursing Studies and Practice agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Journal of Clinical Nursing Studies and Practice the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to remix, adapt and build upon the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and the initial publication in Journal of Clinical Nursing Studies and Practice.
- Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Journal of Clinical Nursing Studies and Practice.
